Wuthering Heights
by Emily Bronte was published in the 1840’s, although it was originally done so
under a pseudonym of Ellis Bell. The plotline is intensely intricate: the
primary ‘story’ follows Catherine and Heathcliff who develop a friendship from
an early age. Nearby resides the Linton family who also have children of
similar ages called Edgar and Isabella. Catherine makes the decision to marry Edgar
who is wealthier and better educated; this intensifies an existing tension
between Edgar and Heathcliff, who both vie for Catherine’s attention. Heathcliff
runs away for 3 years during which Catherine is married to Edgar. Following
from this is a lot of issues and events that occur. A few years into the future
Catherine has died leaving Edgar with a baby girl whom he names Cathy, and Heathcliff
is married to an unhappy Isabella. Isabella eventually leaves, she gives birth
to her son Linton, and upon her early death Linton is sent to Edgar but is
taken by his father Heathcliff. Further years down the line, Cathy (Junior) and
Linton develop a similar bond that was shared by Catherine and Heathcliff when
they were children. This plot develops still but the lives of Catherine and
Cathy are predominant. The obvious main themes, and the central core of the
book, are love, tragedy and revenge.
However, there are many underlying themes throughout. One of
these is racial discrimination – although it’s never brought out into the
forefront, Bronte uses subtle indications to suggest that Heathcliff is
‘different’, often by the uses of imagery or description. For example, “dark-skinned
gypsy in aspect”, “the cheeks were sallow, and half covered with black
whiskers; the brows lowering, the eyes deep-set and singular”. This could be Bronte herself expressing
uneasiness perhaps or an uncertainty towards a character such as Heathcliff;
however, being reasonably well educated you could also speculate that this is
Bronte subtly suggesting how others would judge a character such as Heathcliff
rather than any judgement by herself.
Catherine within
the novel is perhaps atypical to a young girl/woman that would be expected in
the late 1700’s, early 1800’s, described as “mischievous and wayward”
- she is portrayed as being quite a
wild character. Having said this, Bronte does revert the female characters back
into roles/characteristics that would be more approved of by 19th
Century society. Through speculation you could assume that this comes from
Bronte still suffering from feeling repressed; so although creating a ‘wayward’
character and showing a feminist retaliation, there is still confines to which
Bronte and Catherine/Cathy (Junior) remain under.
From a personal
point of view, the book itself can often feel like a labyrinth of events which
can sometimes be confused when the books narrative changes tense. Also, the
characters are more often than not ignorant and a little insular. Catherine in
particular is often portrayed as being spoilt, childish and petulant –
Heathcliff also shows similar traits. This is carried on throughout the book as
a tit-for-tat style revenge occurs between two rival families. Personally, I
found the characters a little frustrating and un-relatable (probably to be expected
due to the difference in time periods). All in all the book is fairly readable with
a definitely interesting plotline, not being completely ‘into’ this genre,
maybe someone who is would really like this book. Unquestionably worth a read
regardless.
An excellent review - I completely agree that it is hard to relate to the characters and for me this makes it hard to really love this novel. They are ignorant and seem to care more for themselves then other people.
ReplyDeleteYour comment on the 'difference' or Heathcliff is interesting. I agree that to our 21st century values there is an underlying racism in this. It also recalls the depictions of the Mason family in Jane Eyre.